The absence of the federal government and the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) in the National Industrial Court on Wednesday, prevented the matter from proceeding.
The suit seeks to challenge NARD for embarking on strike from August 2 to September 17, 2021 was slated for hearing in Wednesday’s proceeding.
The court presided over by Justice Bashar Alkali on September 17, 2021 had ruled that parties should proceed with their applications due to their failure to reach definite terms of settlement.
The court on the same date directed NARD to suspend the strike embarked on, on August 2, 2021.
The court in addition ruled that the claimant, FG could proceed with its motion on notice on interlocutory injunction and directed that the defendant’s preliminary objection would be taken along with the substantive suit.
Alkali also directed that the case file be reassigned by the president of the court.
However, when the matter which was reassigned came before Justice Benedict Kanyip, the president of the court, parties and their representatives were absent.
“The matter is slated for hearing and neither parties nor their representatives are in court in spite of being served with hearing notices.
“Given the importance of this matter, the court is giving the parties another opportunity.
“The matter is hereby adjourned until March 3. Hearing notices should be served on the parties and proof of service should be kept in the case file,” Kanyip ruled.
The court directed the parties to proceed with the suit after the parties stated that their negotiation as advised by the court had failed.
The claimant had filed motion ex-parte and motion on notice on August 23,2021 seeking amongst others, an interlocutory injunction compelling the striking doctors to suspend the strike they embarked on August 2, 2021.
The claimant’s application also sought for an order of interlocutory injunction restraining members of the respondent in all States of the Federation from further continuing with the industrial action embarked on August 2, 2021.
Meanwhile on September 15, 2021, the court had adjourned for ruing when the parties agreed to go back to the negotiation table.
It was due to the failure of the negotiation that the court had ordered that the substantive suit proceed for hearing.
