The US Supreme Court recently ruled that former President Donald Trump enjoys some immunity from prosecution for official acts taken while in office.
This decision, split along ideological lines (6-3), is expected to delay his trial concerning charges related to his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
The conservative majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, stated that while a president is “not above the law,” they do have “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for official acts.
However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts, and the case has been sent back to a lower court to distinguish between Trump’s official and unofficial conduct.
ALSO READ How Trump’s guilty verdict threatens to upend his campaign
The dissenting liberal justices, particularly Justice Sonia Sotomayor, expressed deep concerns about the ruling’s implications for democracy, suggesting it could set a dangerous precedent for presidential immunity.
Trump has celebrated the decision, claiming it as a victory against what he calls politically motivated investigations.
This ruling means the District Court will now conduct pre-trial hearings, making it unlikely for the trial to commence before the upcoming presidential election.
Legal experts predict that this delay will extend well beyond the election, allowing Trump to potentially avoid prosecution if he is re-elected and can influence the continuation of federal cases against him.
