• Home
  • Agric
  • Sci, Tech & Innovation
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Hausa Articles/News
  • More
    • Business/Banking & Finance
    • Politics/Elections
    • Entertainments & Sports
    • International
    • Investigation
    • Law & Human Rights
    • Africa
    • Research and Development
    • Corruption/Accountability
    • Hassan Gimba
    • Column
    • Prof. Jibrin Ibrahim
    • Prof. M.K. Othman
    • Defense/Security
    • Education
    • Energy/Electricity
    • Entertainment/Arts & Sports
    • Society and Lifestyle
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Health & Healthy Living
    • Technology
    • International News
    • Interviews
    • Investigation/Fact-Check
    • Judiciary/Legislature/Law & Human Rights
    • Oil & Gas/Mineral Resources
    • Media/PR/Journalism
    • Elections
    • General News
    • Presidency
    • Press Releases
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Board Of Advisory
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ethics Policy
    • Teamwork And Collaboration Policy
    • Fact-Checking Policy
    • Advertising
  • The Stories
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Tension rises between NMA, TUC over leadership at FNPHY
  • Nigeria’s perennial flood: Occurrence of preventable disasters (II), By Prof. M. K. Othman
  • PHC neglect at the heart of Africa’s health crisis – Expert
  • Kwara NMA rejects new medical allowance review
  • EU, NASRDA to launch satellite agriculture project in 2026
  • AGRA, FAO launch $580,000 project to reform South Sudan’s seed sector
  • Bauchi, UNICEF roll out water safety project in rural areas
  • Cyber intrusion: PRNigeria petitions police against NIPSS officials
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
AsheNewsAsheNews
  • Home
  • Agric

    AGRA, FAO launch $580,000 project to reform South Sudan’s seed sector

    July 7, 2025

    Mushroom: Expert says farming could add 25% to Nigeria’s GDP

    July 6, 2025

    Hungry fields, empty plates: Why Nigeria must act now on food security

    July 6, 2025

    Tinubu targets global competitiveness in agric

    July 6, 2025

    Maistrade unveils major fund for farmers, students, and small businesses

    July 5, 2025
  • Sci, Tech & Innovation

    EU, NASRDA to launch satellite agriculture project in 2026

    July 7, 2025

    Data privacy breach: MultiChoice faces major sanction from NDPC

    July 7, 2025

    Bill Gates warns, “Only a few jobs will survive the AI takeover”

    July 6, 2025

    BRICS leaders push for data safeguards in face of AI boom

    July 6, 2025

    Lagos, China move to seal economic, tech pact

    July 5, 2025
  • Health

    Tension rises between NMA, TUC over leadership at FNPHY

    July 7, 2025

    PHC neglect at the heart of Africa’s health crisis – Expert

    July 7, 2025

    Kwara NMA rejects new medical allowance review

    July 7, 2025

    NDDC delivers relief to flood-hit Bayelsa communities

    July 7, 2025

    Local drug firms boost access to life-saving medicines — ACPN

    July 7, 2025
  • Environment

    Bauchi, UNICEF roll out water safety project in rural areas

    July 7, 2025

    Lagos vows tougher action against flooding

    July 7, 2025

    Lagos doubles down on single-use plastics ban

    July 7, 2025

    Thunderstorms, heavy showers to hit Nigeria starting Monday – NiMet

    July 7, 2025

    Midnight flood displaces residents in Katsina’s Dankama community

    July 6, 2025
  • Hausa Articles/News

    A Saka Baki, A Sasanta Saɓani Tsakanin ‘Yanjarida Da Liman, Daga Muhammad Sajo

    May 21, 2025

    Dan majalisa ya raba kayan miliyoyi a Funtuwa da Dandume

    March 18, 2025

    [VIDIYO] Fassarar mafalki akan aikin Hajji

    January 6, 2025

    Mafarkin gaisawa da makiyi, Tare da Sheikh Aliyu Y. Sokoto

    January 5, 2025

    [RA’AYI)] Adawar Siyasa A Jihar Sokoto Da Sauran Lamurra

    September 6, 2024
  • More
    1. Business/Banking & Finance
    2. Politics/Elections
    3. Entertainments & Sports
    4. International
    5. Investigation
    6. Law & Human Rights
    7. Africa
    8. Research and Development
    9. Corruption/Accountability
    10. Hassan Gimba
    11. Column
    12. Prof. Jibrin Ibrahim
    13. Prof. M.K. Othman
    14. Defense/Security
    15. Education
    16. Energy/Electricity
    17. Entertainment/Arts & Sports
    18. Society and Lifestyle
    19. Food & Agriculture
    20. Health & Healthy Living
    21. Technology
    22. International News
    23. Interviews
    24. Investigation/Fact-Check
    25. Judiciary/Legislature/Law & Human Rights
    26. Oil & Gas/Mineral Resources
    27. Media/PR/Journalism
    28. Elections
    29. General News
    30. Presidency
    31. Press Releases
    Featured
    Recent

    Tension rises between NMA, TUC over leadership at FNPHY

    July 7, 2025

    Nigeria’s perennial flood: Occurrence of preventable disasters (II), By Prof. M. K. Othman

    July 7, 2025

    PHC neglect at the heart of Africa’s health crisis – Expert

    July 7, 2025
  • About Us
    1. Contact Us
    2. Board Of Advisory
    3. Privacy Policy
    4. Ethics Policy
    5. Teamwork And Collaboration Policy
    6. Fact-Checking Policy
    7. Advertising
    Featured
    Recent

    Tension rises between NMA, TUC over leadership at FNPHY

    July 7, 2025

    Nigeria’s perennial flood: Occurrence of preventable disasters (II), By Prof. M. K. Othman

    July 7, 2025

    PHC neglect at the heart of Africa’s health crisis – Expert

    July 7, 2025
  • The Stories
AsheNewsAsheNews
Home»Environment/Climate Change»GMO safety debate is over, By Mark Lynas
Environment/Climate Change

GMO safety debate is over, By Mark Lynas

Abdallah el-KurebeBy Abdallah el-KurebeNovember 16, 2019No Comments6 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The GMO debate is over again. Last week, the prestigious National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine issued what is probably the most far-reaching report ever produced by the scientific community on genetically engineered food and crops. The conclusion was unambiguous: Having examined hundreds of scientific papers written on the subject, sat through hours of live testimony from activists and considered hundreds more comments from the general public, the scientists wrote that they “found no substantiated evidence that foods from GE crops were less safe than foods from non-GE crops.”

The National Academies process was both impressively inclusive and explicitly consensual. As noted in the preface to their report, the scientists “took all of the comments” however ludicrous “as constructive challenges” and considered them carefully. Thus the expert committee patiently gave yogic flyer-turned-anti-GMO activist Jeffrey Smith a generous 20-minute slot within which to make his customary assertion that genetically engineered foods cause just about every imaginable modern ailment. Greenpeace also offered invited testimony. So did Giles-Eric Seralini, the French professor who suffered the ultimate scientific indignity of having his paper claiming rats fed GMOs suffered tumors retracted in 2013.

Each of their claims was examined in turn. Do GE foods cause cancer? No patterns of changing cancer incidence over time are “generally similar” between the US, where GMO foods are ubiquitous, and the United Kingdom, where they are virtually unknown. How about kidney disease? US rates have barely budged over a quarter century. Obesity or diabetes? There is “no published evidence to support the hypothesis” of a link between them and GE foods. Celiac disease? “No major difference” between the US and UK again. Allergies? “The committee did not find a relationship between consumption of GE foods and the increase in prevalence of food allergies.” Autism? Again, evidence comparing the US and UK “does not support the hypothesis of a link.”

In a rational world, everyone previously fearful about the health effects of GMOs would read the report, breathe a huge sigh of relief and start looking for more evidence-based explanations for worrying trends in health issues like diabetes, autism and food allergies. But psychological associations developed over many years are difficult to break. A Pew Center poll in 2015 found only 37 percent of the public thought GE foods were safe, as compared to 88 percent of scientists, a greater gap than on any other issue of scientific controversy, including climate change, evolution and childhood vaccinations. These entrenched attitudes are not about to disappear especially since they are continually reinforced by a vocal and well-funded anti-GMO lobby.

There is also political path dependence. Vermont’s GMO labeling law, scheduled to throw US food manufacturers and retailers into chaos when it comes into force on July 1, is predicated on the explicit assumption that GE foods may be unsafe. “There is a lack of consensus regarding the validity of the research and science surrounding the safety of genetically engineered foods,” Vermont’s Act states in its preamble. Indeed, such foods “potentially pose risks to health [and] safety. Will Vermont’s legislature reconsider its Act now that it stands so clearly on the wrong side of a rock-solid scientific consensus? Of course not.

The National Academies report should make particularly uncomfortable reading for the environmental movement, many of whose leading member groups now exhibit all the hallmarks of full-scale science denialism on the issue. A spokeswoman from Friends of the Earth dismissed the report as “deceptive” before she had even read it. The group’s website claims that “numerous studies” show GE foods can pose “serious risks” to human health. Another environmentalist group, Food and Water Watch, issued a pre-publication rebuttal that conspiratorially accused the National Academies of having undisclosed links with Monsanto, before reasserting its view that “there is no consensus, and there remains a very vigorous debate among scientists… about the safety and merits of this technology.”

But despite these shrill denials, the truth is that there is no more of a debate on the safety of GE crops than on reality of climate change, the scientific consensus on which all these same green groups aggressively defend. And the irony goes deeper: many of the strategies now being employed to demonize GMOs come straight out of the climate denialist playbook. There’s the same promotion of false ‘no consensus’ statements by groups of self-appointed experts. Why, more than 300 “scientists and legal experts” signed a ‘no consensus on GMO safety’ statement last year, Greenpeace reminds us. That sounds like a lot, until you compare it with the 30,000 “American scientists” who have supposedly signed a petition claiming that there is “no convincing scientific evidence” linking CO2 with climate change, which Greenpeace (rightly in my view) ignores.

There’s also a worrying trend towards the harassment of bona fide scientists. Just as senior Republicans have shamefully targeted climate experts with politically-motivated subpoenas, so an anti-GMO group called US Right to Know has slapped dozens of geneticists and molecular biologists working at public universities with repeated Freedom of Information Act requests demanding access to thousands of their private emails. In some cases, scientists have as a result of subsequent campaigns received death threats, and had their laboratory and home addresses circulated menacingly on social media.

There is still plenty of room for genuine dissent moreover. The National Academies report is zealous in pointing out some of the experienced difficulties and drawbacks of GMOs. The overuse of GE crops has indeed led to the evolution of resistance, both in weeds and insects, it finds. Also, industry domination of the technology might restrict access of small farmers in poorer countries to improved seeds. And mandatory GMO labelling might well be a good way to raise public trust in a more transparent food system.

But these real areas of debate do not include GMO safety. That issue has now been definitively put to bed. So let’s be clear once again: the safety debate is over. If you vaccinate your kids and believe that climate change is real, you need to stop being scared of genetically modified foods.

Mark Lynas is a writer and campaigner on climate change and a visiting fellow at the Cornell Alliance for Science

Biotechnology GMO Mark Lynas
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Abdallah el-Kurebe
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Related Posts

EU, NASRDA to launch satellite agriculture project in 2026

July 7, 2025

AGRA, FAO launch $580,000 project to reform South Sudan’s seed sector

July 7, 2025

Bauchi, UNICEF roll out water safety project in rural areas

July 7, 2025

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Tension rises between NMA, TUC over leadership at FNPHY

July 7, 2025

Nigeria’s perennial flood: Occurrence of preventable disasters (II), By Prof. M. K. Othman

July 7, 2025

PHC neglect at the heart of Africa’s health crisis – Expert

July 7, 2025

Kwara NMA rejects new medical allowance review

July 7, 2025
About Us
About Us

ASHENEWS (AsheNewsDaily.com), published by PenPlus Online Media Publishers, is an independent online newspaper. We report development news, especially on Agriculture, Science, Health and Environment as they affect the under-reported rural and urban poor.

We also conduct investigations, especially in the areas of ASHE, as well as other general interests, including corruption, human rights, illicit financial flows, and politics.

Contact Info:
  • 1st floor, Dogon Daji House, No. 5, Maiduguri Road, Sokoto
  • +234(0)7031140009
  • ashenewsdaily@gmail.com
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
© 2025 All Rights Reserved. ASHENEWS Daily Designed & Managed By DeedsTech

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.